🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."